Orlando Bloom stars in a gazing and obsessive role of a first year internal medicine (read: stay away from knives and needles) resident at a Los Angeles hospital, as the “Good” doctor. He is driven by a relentless, merciless and increasingly psychopathic search for respect, deference and status. Bloom consumes most of the screen time portraying how the chase for respect, recognition and respectable medical doctor can lead to an unethical, dangerous spiral. Based on the Daly’s answers after the screening, it seems that the film tries to blur the line between intentional harm and a cycle of bad decision that perhaps many can let themselves get pulled into. Really? Is this the film's intent? To make the viewer question his/her own judgement of ethical and moral behavior? There is no ambiguity, there is no blur between responsibility and bad intentions of the “good” doctor. My slight fascination with the medical profession has ensured that the film contains no boredom, or perhaps it didn't for anyone, even those indifferent to learning more about the portrayals of the working and personal lives of doctors. Orlando Bloom is truly immersed in being Dr. Martin Blake, there is no doubt. Please do not take this as of sign of laziness, but I must steal
Variety's synopsis:
"Orlando Bloom stars as an English doctor newly arrived in California for his first year of residency in Lance Daly's highly un-Hippocratic psychological thriller "The Good Doctor." Black comedy lurks just below the suspenseful surface, with more than a hint of "Lolita"-esque absurdity as the doc falls under the kittenish spell of a nubile blonde high-school patient. Daly deftly creates a disturbing, Chabrol-like tension that plays on immediate identification with the handsome medico's lonely, shy vulnerability and slow-building horror at the depths to which his self-delusion can sink. Strong cast and nuanced direction prescribe healthy distribution."
